Survivors of Super Typhoon Odette in the Philippines are taking legal action against Shell, alleging the company's contribution to climate change made the event more likely and severe. The lawsuit, filed in UK courts, aims to hold Shell accountable for its role in the climate crisis and the resulting damages. This case is part of a larger movement seeking to attribute climate harms to fossil fuel companies and seek justice for vulnerable communities impacted by extreme weather events. The survivors' legal action highlights the disproportionate impact of climate change on regions like the Philippines, where communities face continuous destruction and struggle to recover. This case represents a significant step in holding major oil and gas producers accountable for their role in climate damages, particularly for those in the Global South.
Author: Drilled
-
The Way Things Are Is Not the Way They Have to Be
Uruguay successfully transitioned its entire economy to rely on renewable energy sources in just two years, slashing poverty rates and showcasing the economic benefits of clean energy. The shift towards green energy was driven by crises and challenges, leading to long-lasting solutions and the ability to export excess energy to neighboring countries. The country's approach, framed as an economic opportunity rather than a climate change issue, highlights the financial incentives of transitioning to clean energy. The article emphasizes the importance of public ownership in ensuring equitable access to resources and the redistributive potential of energy distribution as a tool for social justice. The discussion also touches on the potential for other countries to lead in climate solutions and the need for a just green transition globally.
-
Philippine Victims of Typhoon Odette File Landmark Legal Challenge Against Shell
Sixty-seven Philippine citizens have filed a legal claim against Shell for its role in climate change that supercharged Typhoon Odette, leading to deaths and destruction. The case is the first to directly link oil and gas-fueled climate change to personal injuries in the Global South. Recent attribution science connects climate change to increased likelihood of storms like Odette, with a study showing anthropogenic climate change has more than doubled the likelihood of such events. The case also highlights Shell's knowledge of their product's contribution to climate change and their decision to increase fossil fuel production. The article discusses the legal obligations of governments to protect the right to a healthy environment, with the opinions of the Philippine Commission on Human Rights and the International Court of Justice setting a significant precedent in climate-related cases. The quality of arguments made in courts and the science backing those arguments will be crucial in determining outcomes, with the use of scientific evidence, including local indigenous knowledge, being important in future climate litigation. Claimants are seeking damages from Shell, which has a deadline to respond before formal court proceedings in December 2025.